Difference between revisions of "Talk:ArcadeShop Amusements"
Spacefractal (talk | contribs) m |
Spacefractal (talk | contribs) m (added a comment.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
--[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 09:37, 29 June 2006 (EDT) | --[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 09:37, 29 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Found up, what happens. Is was very far what I trought: it was just a missing <nowiki><br style="clear:both;"/></nowiki> between tables! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Just update all vendors page to sync with the new format (including your destription, wich seen to been missing). | ||
| + | |||
| + | I guess the destription you made is missing in the new table (these you made in all vendors, should NOT been removed)? I guess you could add a destription tag for these, even there are not the uppers tag. Even pages with no reviews could sync with this one, with just adding a "Not reviewed yet" instead. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The comment field could even been renamed or changed if you want. | ||
| + | Not just the review. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 10:42, 29 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 29 June 2006
Problem: The panes go side to side, I don't think the user should have to scroll way over to the right.
--Buddabing 09:31, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
Please see the discuttion thread. We know and going to fixing it now. It was only tested in a old version of firefox.
--Spacefractal 09:37, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
Found up, what happens. Is was very far what I trought: it was just a missing <br style="clear:both;"/> between tables!
Just update all vendors page to sync with the new format (including your destription, wich seen to been missing).
I guess the destription you made is missing in the new table (these you made in all vendors, should NOT been removed)? I guess you could add a destription tag for these, even there are not the uppers tag. Even pages with no reviews could sync with this one, with just adding a "Not reviewed yet" instead.
The comment field could even been renamed or changed if you want. Not just the review.
--Spacefractal 10:42, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
