Difference between revisions of "Talk:How to MAME - the basics"
Spacefractal (talk | contribs) m |
m (comment) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 06:28, 3 June 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 06:28, 3 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I still disagree. IMO command line MAME is much easier to set up. | ||
+ | |||
+ | But we can have it both ways. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We could have a "Do you know what a command line prompt is and how to use it? If yes, click here, if no click there." type of choice and have a step-by-step process of setting up MAME32 or command line MAME. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 12:54, 3 June 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 11:54, 3 June 2007
I strongly disagree with the advice not to use the MAME command line binary.
I won't revert that change, for now.
--Buddabing 17:44, 2 June 2007 (EDT)
It only destription how to do, without using a FE (hince why the fact about command line). But all cabinet have one form for a FE, hince. For basic testing MAME32 IS much better, until you use it with a FE, here commandline is only.
Maybe it should do someting like How_to_MAME_-_the_advanced, how you can incompert it to use a FE (where commandline is much better here).
So for the newcomer for testing MAME, MAME32 is the better choise to test the roms or such..
--Spacefractal 06:28, 3 June 2007 (EDT)
I still disagree. IMO command line MAME is much easier to set up.
But we can have it both ways.
We could have a "Do you know what a command line prompt is and how to use it? If yes, click here, if no click there." type of choice and have a step-by-step process of setting up MAME32 or command line MAME.
--Buddabing 12:54, 3 June 2007 (EDT)