Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emdkay"
Spacefractal (talk | contribs) m (About {Vendors tags}) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 16:15, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | --[[User:Spacefractal|Spacefractal]] 16:15, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Go ahead and modify the template any way you want. I'm very happy with the changes you've made with the review system. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think I'm done for today. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Buddabing|Buddabing]] 16:20, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 26 June 2006
I don't like the 1-10 rating business, so I did not include one.
Buddabing 13:40, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I do like the "Recommended" vs. "Not Recommended" options. I may change some to "Highy Recommended". Not for emdkay, however.
I wonder if we should put a link to emdkay's off-topic ponzi scheme shenanigans? All other things being equal, that might cause some folks to choose other vendors. That would be fine with me because I disapprove of ponzi schemes, even though emdkay did a good job on my marquee.
Buddabing 13:52, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I Agree. Im have changed mine to use this sheme instead.
--Spacefractal 14:01, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I see you going to add destriptions about Vendoders. The Template:Vendors mayben reformatted to use a simple page list, and let it link back to the main vendors page. After that, all reviews can do go below, and link back to the review.
--Spacefractal 16:15, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
Go ahead and modify the template any way you want. I'm very happy with the changes you've made with the review system.
I think I'm done for today.
--Buddabing 16:20, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
